Artweaver vs Krita: Which Is Better For Me?
Are you an artist trying to resolve the battle between Artweaver vs Krita?
As an artist, your tools will evolve alongside technology.
Your cursor and stylus have become your new brush, and your screen has become the canvas.
The materials you have to work with have also evolved from paints and watercolors into the different digital studios and programs you will use.
Now, let’s answer the question: Which program is better suited for me?
Table of Contents
Artweaver Vs Krita
Artweaver is a painting program renowned for its ability to mimic real-life brush strokes, offering various tools in both its free and paid versions.
On the other hand, Krita is an open-source painting program created by artists as an affordable option that gives paid software a run for its money.
Both programs have their strengths and weaknesses, and this article will help you decide which one is best for you.
Boris Eyrich Software developed and founded Artweaver in 2010.
Boris owned an IT and software company in West Germany.
He noticed that the current illustration programs on the market were very expensive.
It did not offer its users enough features to warrant their cost.
In 2010, the digital world grew exponentially.
Designers like Eyrich adapted to the new technologies and provided more alternatives to illustration programs available at that time.
Monoliths like Adobe had an iron-clad grip on the market of digital design software and could charge absurd prices with little to no competition.
Adobe is still an industry leader.
But plenty of cheaper alternatives still on par with Adobe programs have popped up since then, including Artweaver.
Eyrich came up with Artweaver to create an affordable illustration program to be used by beginners and seasoned veterans alike.
One of Artweaver’s best features for users is its authentic simulation of a wide variety of preset brush types and materials that can be customized to your liking.
Krita has an odd history.
Its origins go back to 1998 when Matthias Ettrich demonstrated a security vulnerability in the illustration program GIMP.
This prompted the KDE project.
This project was made up of a group of developers and volunteers dedicated to making a free, open-source, and secure illustration program.
This resulted in the release of KImage by Michale Koch in 1999.
This was the earliest form of Krita.
The development of KImage continued into the 2000s with large numbers of people contributing to the project.
The project’s name was changed multiple times to avoid copyright infringement.
It changed from KImage to KOffice and eventually arrived at what we now know as Krita.
In 2009, Krita was taken to the next level with more community funding and grants from Google’s summer of code.
This allowed Krita to make a big jump in the program’s stability.
This resulted in the creation of the Krita Foundation, a group of people who are dedicated to supporting Krita to this day.
We will refer to Krita’s strong community quite often throughout this article.
It is one of Krita’s best features for both new and experienced users.
Artweaver vs Krita?
The first question you must ask yourself before choosing between the two is how much you want to pay for it.
We all know that high-quality illustration programs can be very expensive.
For example, the most commonly used program for illustration, Adobe Illustrator, charges USD 21 a month for using their software.
Many illustrators use multiple programs for their art.
The cost of subscriptions can add up quickly.
This can be detrimental to new artists on a low budget.
Even for seasoned artists, it often becomes difficult to justify paying for so many subscriptions.
But thankfully neither Krita nor Artweaver requires a subscription.
One of Krita’s greatest strengths is that it’s completely free.
Where other programs like Artweaver will hide some of their features behind a paywall, Krita gives you all of its features upfront with no strings attached.
As Krita offers many of the same tools that other paid programs do, it is a great option to learn how these tools work without paying.
Instead of having its users pay for the software, Krita relies on donations from its tightly-knit community of artists.
As we have said, creating your art can be expensive.
Having one less program to pay for can be a huge benefit for new artists who are on a budget.
Although Artweaver offers its basic features and standard tools for free, features like its enhanced functionality, detailed brush control, and technical support will cost you USD 40.
This is still quite cheap compared to other programs, which can cost upwards of $100 or rely on a subscription.
But what sorts of tools and features are you paying for when you buy into these programs?
Furthermore, how do the tools that Artweaver and Krita offer differ from each other?
All programs like Artweaver and Krita will provide you with industry-standard tools that include the Brush, Eraser, Filler, and Selector.
It’s important to understand these tools to get the most out of the program you choose.
The brush is the foundation of any painting or illustration program.
It will be your primary tool when it comes to illustrations of any kind.
Nearly all programs today offer brushes that come in many shapes and sizes.
Different brushes and brush styles will have different widths, densities, and coverage.
The brush can mimic many real-life media like an actual paintbrush, crayon, pencil, and calligraphy brush.
Artists do make mistakes.
After all, we’re only human.
But with the eraser tool, your mistakes can be fixed, and you can achieve perfection.
The eraser tool allows you to undo any misaimed brush strokes or overzealous use of the spray can tool.
The Filler tool (also known as the Paint can) is a straightforward tool with little variety outside of color choice.
As the name suggests, the Filler will fill the entirety of a closed space.
Finally, the Selector tools allow you to cut out a segment of the page to paint within, delete, or separate.
All of these tools will be at the core of any illustration program you choose, including Artweaver and Krita.
Both Artweaver and Krita do a great job designing these tools.
However, they differ in their approaches to the most important tool an artist has: the paintbrush.
Artweaver has one of the best-preset selections of brushes on the market for those of you working within a small budget.
It gives you a massive selection of brush types, including acrylics, chalk, crayons, pastels, oils, and everything in between.
Whichever brush type you choose, you can further customize its style from a wide variety of options offered by Artweaver.
This easily accessible, large selection of brush designs is a major benefit to using Artweaver, as it allows you to truly express your ideas.
Remember that you are not limited to only using the predefined brushes, but you can also design your own.
As we mentioned earlier, this highlights one of Artweaver’s key strengths.
This would be its realistic simulation of a wide variety of brushes that you can configure to any desired purpose.
But this is not the only useful feature that Artweaver offers for its users.
More Fun Tools
Another great tool you may want to take advantage of is Artweaver’s ability to record your painting process from start to finish.
You can finally kickstart your Youtube career of painting tutorials and become the next Bob Ross.
This lovely feature is even included in the free version of Artweaver, with minor limitations on controlling the playback.
Yet another exciting feature offered by Artweaver is the ability for you to work with other artists on the same piece of art simultaneously.
This feature is quite a big selling point for many people living through COVID-19 restrictions today.
Whether you’re doing graphic design work with your coworkers or making art with your friends, the feature of remote working is a great bonus to using this program.
It’s even part of the free package.
Free tools like these can make a huge difference in your art, which is why Artweaver serves as a great choice for artists on a tight budget.
But some features of Artweaver’s tools are still hidden behind that $40 paywall.
This includes support for documents with 8 or 16 bits per channel, multiple CPU cores, and 64-bit.
In the end, it’s up to you to decide whether the cost outweighs your need for these tools or whether the free version of Artweaver is enough for you.
Many artists today think that paying for illustration software is the only option if you’re trying to get access to tools and features worth using.
Features like higher-quality brushes and faster rendering are often placed behind a paywall.
This is a misconception that Krita has exposed, showing us that artists can come together to form a powerful community.
Through Krita’s community, artists can work together to make the most powerful tools in the industry today available to anyone at no cost.
This community created a free program that can compete with the most expensive software currently on the market.
All of Krita’s tools are available to you at no cost as soon as you download the program.
This includes all of the industry-standard tools provided by other painting programs discussed above.
One downside to using Krita instead of Artweaver is its lack of presets for the different brush types.
When comparing the preset brushes offered by Krita and Artweaver, Krita falls short of Artweaver’s authentic brush feel.
Although this can be amended by downloading user-created brushes, it’s still a hassle to do when Artweaver offers the same brushes from the get-go.
On Artweaver, you can easily tell what kind of brush has been used to paint each brush stroke.
In comparison, Krita’s preset brushes all look quite similar to each, only having the opacity and edges slightly adjusted.
On the bright side, Krita’s open-source lets users with programming experience go into the source code and make their brushes.
Now let’s compare the interface, Artweaver vs. Krita.
When you first download Artweaver, you may notice that the design of the interface looks quite dated.
The design is reminiscent of the earlier forms of Microsoft Paint, with a grey color scheme and choppy buttons.
On the bright side, if you decide to upgrade your Artweaver, you will be able to improve and customize your interface substantially.
This includes customizing palettes for shortcuts, brushes and different presets, and even customizable keyboard shortcuts.
You can even change the color scheme of the entire program.
Additional interface features that come with upgrading include adjusting and rotating your canvas and using mirror painting to create symmetrical paintings.
On the other hand, Krita has been able to stay modern with its interface design.
Most likely because of its embrace of user input and development.
When you first download Krita, you will immediately notice that its design is sleek and polished.
The color scheme and toolbar designs look very similar to one of the most popular digital studios for design and illustration: Adobe.
Krita uses the same aesthetic and layout as the Adobe line of products.
It looks like a carbon copy of Adobe Photoshop (even down to the layers box in the bottom right).
Although it’s funny that they were so blatant in their inspirations, by no means is Krita’s interface decision a bad one.
There’s a reason that Adobe is a product leader when it comes to design and illustration software.
They have one of the best and most user-friendly interfaces on the market.
Krita’s mimicking of it further pushes their vision of providing artists with a highly accessible illustration program.
This is why users who have used Adobe illustration programs in the past may feel right at home when switching over to Krita.
How about the community of Artweaver vs Krita?
It’s important to have a community in digital design that you can turn to for support and feedback regarding your art.
Krita does a great job of providing its users with an active community.
It encourages everyone to get involved with the program’s development.
As we have mentioned a few times now, Krita does this through its open-source access to all users for free.
The founders encourage the program’s users to contribute to Krita’s continued development by creating content for the program.
This content includes tutorials for new users and guides to teach even the most experienced users helpful tips and tricks.
Those with coding experience can help the entire community by adding new features and tools like new brush types and styles.
This creates a constant stream of new features that you can use for your art.
Additionally, this means that the program is constantly evolving and growing, so you will never stagnate as an artist when using Krita.
Through its forums, you can share your art or comment on others.
Moreover, you can find inspiration and concepts or even new techniques.
Artweaver, on the other hand, is severely lacking in a strong community for its users.
There are official forums that Artweaver created, but they are difficult to access from Artweaver’s official website.
These forums are not active.
There are no other popular websites or platforms for its users to gather and converse about their art and the program itself.
Artweaver’s official forums are buried on their website.
You have to go through countless menus and various tabs until you find their forum section.
Where Krita promotes its community right on the home page, Artweaver has hidden theirs away.
This has caused Artweaver’s community to become nonexistent and turned their forums into a ghost town with many posts being many years old.
This makes it difficult for Artweaver users to connect.
If you are running into problems with the software, it will be difficult to find support from other users.
Remember that your access to 24/7 technical support is hiding behind that $40 paywall.
Therefore, you may have more difficulty finding a solution to your problem quickly when you use Artweaver.
To Sum Up: Artweaver vs Krita Strengths and Weaknesses
Here are some strengths and weaknesses of each software.
Krita is an open-source painting software that is free to use and has a strong focus on digital painting and animation.
It has a robust set of features, including a customizable brush engine, layer management, and support for a variety of file formats.
Krita also has a large and active community that provides tutorials, resources, and plugins.
Artweaver is a painting software that focuses on natural media, with a wide range of brushes that mimic traditional media like pencils, pens, and watercolors.
It also has a tracing paper feature that allows artists to work with a reference image while creating artwork.
Artweaver has a more intuitive interface than Krita, making it easier to use for beginners.
Both Krita and Artweaver have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.
Krita is better for digital painting and animation, while Artweaver is better for mimicking traditional media.
Additionally, Krita has a steeper learning curve but offers more customization options, while Artweaver is more user-friendly but has fewer customization options.
Artweaver vs Krita?
Well, both Artweaver and Krita have their clear advantages and disadvantages.
Artweaver has a wide variety of brushes that are very accurate to their physical counterparts.
Still, many features are hidden behind their $40 paywall.
The program lacks a strong community – which makes Artweaver better suited for an experienced artist.
Krita has a large community supporting it with lots of helpful tutorials.
But its brushes are not the best to have.
This means that it’s most suitable for an artist who is just starting and working on little to no budget.
Even with the downsides to each program, they are both excellent.
We encourage you to try them out before fully committing to either one.
If you found this article on Artweaver vs Krita interesting, the articles below will equally pique your interest.