Stable Diffusion Copyright: What AI Artists Need to Know
Here’s everything you need to know about Stable Diffusion copyright.
Generative AI is testing the limits of existing copyright law and bringing up a number of new questions.
Table of Contents
Who Owns the AI-Generated Artwork?
The legislation is yet to evolve and make their and to make it clear exactly what is the case of who owns the art made in these systems.
So, the first thing to note is that you can absolutely use everything you create in Stable Diffusion for commercial purposes.
Firstly, creating an existing brand or trademark inside of stable diffusion can breach the copyright of those businesses.
You also have to be aware of commercializing work with the likeness of a famous person.
As this can breach the regulations of using that image.
But one thing to bear in mind is that on the stability.ai terms of service, they say by your use of stable diffusion you hereby agree to forfeit all intellectual property rights claims worldwide regardless of legal jurisdiction.
Which says that they are allowing all of the works created by Stable Diffusion to be put into the public domain.
I have a feeling that this is going to be hard to uphold in the future.
And the will of creatives is to be able to own and copyright their works made in Stable Diffusion.
So watch this space.
I will continue to update this section as precedents are set.
Thoughts on Balancing Moral Rights and Freedom in AI Art
Balancing the moral rights of creators with the freedom of others to use and build upon AI-generated art is a complex and nuanced issue.
On one hand, creators have a moral right to the integrity of their work and recognition as the author of that work.
On the other hand, the use and building upon an artwork are important for the progress and development of art and technology.
This could involve creating licensing agreements that specify how to use the work and by whom.
Also, specify who has the right to make changes or modifications to the work.
This would allow creators to retain control over how to use their work.
Moreover, prevent the use of their work in a way that is prejudicial to their honor or reputation.
Establish a System of Copyright or Moral Rights for AI-Generated Art
Another potential solution is to establish a system of copyright or moral rights for AI-generated art.
One that is separate from the traditional system for human-created art.
This would take into account the unique nature of AI art and the different ways in which an author creates, distributes, and uses the art.
We need to create laws addressing AI-generated art’s rights, and responsibilities of creators, users, and distributors.
Release Artwork Under Open-Source or Creative Commons Licenses
Additionally, creators could be given the option to release their work under open-source or creative commons licenses.
Free use, distribution, and modification of work while protecting creators’ moral rights make up its framework.
This approach would allow for the development and progress of art and technology while still giving credit to the creators of the work.
Balancing the moral rights of creators with the freedom of others to use and build upon AI-generated art is a complex issue.
It requires careful consideration.
Possible solutions include creating clear licensing agreements and establishing separate systems of copyright or moral rights for AI-generated art.
As well as creators releasing their work under open-source or creative commons licenses.
Finding balance in recognizing creators’ rights and fostering art and tech progress is important.
We took a look at how AI generative art matches up with copyright law.
And as we can see it is a cloudy situation at the moment.
Remember that you can commercialize all works that you create as long as it doesn’t infringe on existing brand or human copyright.
You may not be able to seek copyright on your works.
And the works will be attributed to being in the public domain.
Leave a Reply